ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Machine Learning Methods for Classifying Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer's Disease Using Genomic Data.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TFProtBert: Detection of Transcription Factors Binding to Methylated DNA Using ProtBert Latent Space Representation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex diseases pose challenges in prediction due to their multifactorial and polygenic nature. This study employed machine learning (ML) to analyze genomic data from the UK Biobank, aiming to predict the genomic predisposition to complex diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We tested logistic regression (LR), ensemble tree methods, and deep learning models for this purpose. LR displayed remarkable stability across various subsets of data, outshining deep learning approaches, which showed greater variability in performance. Additionally, ML methods demonstrated an ability to maintain optimal performance despite correlated genomic features due to linkage disequilibrium. When comparing the performance of polygenic risk score (PRS) with ML methods, PRS consistently performed at an average level. By employing explainability tools in the ML models of MS, we found that the results confirmed the polygenicity of this disease. The highest-prioritized genomic variants in MS were identified as expression or splicing quantitative trait loci located in non-coding regions within or near genes associated with the immune response, with a prevalence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene annotations. Our findings shed light on both the potential and the challenges of employing ML to capture complex genomic patterns, paving the way for improved predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.