Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40076706›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Inhibition of Thioredoxin-Reductase by Auranofin as a Pro-Oxidant Anticancer Strategy for Glioblastoma: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Nelly Chmelyuk, Maria Kordyukova, Maria Sorokina, Semyon Sinyavskiy, Valeriya Meshcheryakova, Vsevolod Belousov, Tatiana Abakumova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nelly ChmelyukDepartment of Synthetic Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2434-2465
Maria KordyukovaNeurotechnology Laboratory, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Federal Medical Biological Agency, 117513 Moscow, Russia.
Maria SorokinaDepartment of Synthetic Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-9480
Semyon SinyavskiyDepartment of Synthetic Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0003-2994-4857
Valeriya MeshcheryakovaDepartment of Synthetic Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0008-2284-0576
Vsevolod BelousovDepartment of Synthetic Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana AbakumovaDepartment of Synthetic Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9139-3326

Funding

Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation 124021400005-3Russian Science Foundation 22-75-10151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a key role in cancer progression and antitumor therapy. Glioblastoma is a highly heterogeneous tumor with different cell populations exhibiting various redox statuses. Elevated ROS levels in cancer cells promote tumor growth and simultaneously make them more sensitive to anticancer drugs, but further elevation leads to cell death and apoptosis. Meanwhile, various subsets of tumor cells, such a glioblastoma stem cells (GSC) or the cells in tumor microenvironment (TME), demonstrate adaptive mechanisms to excessive ROS production by developing effective antioxidant systems such as glutathione- and thioredoxin-dependent. GSCs demonstrate higher chemoresistance and lower ROS levels than other glioma cells, while TME cells create a pro-oxidative environment and have immunosuppressive effects. Both subpopulations have become an attractive target for developing therapies. Increased expression of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) is often associated with tumor progression and poor patient survival. Various TrxR inhibitors have been investigated as potential anticancer therapies, including nitrosoureas, flavonoids and metallic complexes. Gold derivatives are irreversible inhibitors of TrxR. Among them, auranofin (AF), a selective TrxR inhibitor, has proven its effectiveness as a drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and its efficacy as an anticancer agent has been demonstrated in preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. However, further clinical application of AF could be challenging due to the low solubility and insufficient delivery to glioblastoma. Different delivery strategies for hydrophobic drugs could be used to increase the concentration of AF in the brain. Combining different therapeutic approaches that affect the redox status of various glioma cell populations could become a new strategy for treating brain tumor diseases.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAuranofinBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaThioredoxin-Disulfide ReductaseAnimalsHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsAuranofinReactive Oxygen SpeciesThioredoxin-Disulfide Reductaseauranofinglioblastomaglioma stem cellsredox systemthioredoxin reductase

Identifiers

PMID40076706
PMCPMC11900239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.