Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40076658›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Challenges and Revisions in Diagnostic Criteria: Advancing Early Detection of Prion Diseases.

Mika Inada Shimamura, Katsuya Satoh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mika Inada ShimamuraBiomedical Research Support Center, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-2173
Katsuya SatohUnit of Medical and Dental Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8007-8710

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18ek0109362,JP20ak0101151 and JP23ek0109620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prion diseases are fatal neurological disorders characterized by abnormal protein accumulation in the brain, leading to neurodegeneration, dementia, and ataxia. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD), the most common form, accounts for 80-90% of cases and progresses rapidly, with most patients surviving <6 months to a year after symptom onset, indicating the importance of early diagnosis. The disease is classified into six subtypes based on PRNP gene polymorphisms, with differences in protein degradation patterns contributing to the diversity of clinical symptoms. However, diagnosis remains challenging because of the variability in clinical presentation and disease duration. Traditional diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) rely on clinical findings, electroencephalogram, and cerebrospinal fluid tests, such as the 14-3-3 protein assay. However, these criteria require pathological confirmation, often delaying diagnosis. The recently proposed Hermann's criteria represent a significant advancement by incorporating newer biomarkers, including magnetic resonance imaging, real-time quaking-induced conversion assay, tau protein, and neurofilament light chain. These criteria improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity but have a slightly higher risk of false positives. This review compares the effectiveness of these biomarkers with the WHO criteria and highlights the importance of early diagnosis for improving patient care.

Indexed as

Prion Diseases14-3-3 ProteinsBiomarkersCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeEarly DiagnosisHumansPrion Proteinstau Proteins14-3-3 ProteinsBiomarkersPrion Proteinstau Proteins14-3-3 proteinsbiomarkersbrainearly diagnosishumans

Identifiers

PMID40076658
PMCPMC11900056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.