ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Biased Opioid Receptor Agonists: Balancing Analgesic Efficacy and Side-Effect Profiles.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tegileridine versus Sufentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Gastrointestinal Recovery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Oliceridine and Hydromorphone for Postoperative Analgesia in Adults Undergoing Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- A Comparison of Oliceridine versus Sufentanil for Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Naltrexone, Naloxone, Morphine, and Fentanyl Pharmacologically Chaperone a Mutant μ-Opioid Receptor via an Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit Site-Dependent Pathway.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Arrestins as programmable integrators of GPCR signaling: structural microstates, spatiotemporal logic, and therapeutic control.Cell discovery · 2026Review
- Phytochemical Profile and Bioactive Potential ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Can Buprenorphine Be Overdosed? The Ceiling Effect and Its Clinical Implications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interpreting Gastrointestinal Recovery After Tegileridine-Based PCIA in Elderly Colorectal Surgery Patients [Letter].Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- A barrier-forming gel for oral mucositis in head and neck cancers patients undergoing radiotherapy: randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Opioids are the most effective option for severe pain. However, it is well documented that the side effects associated with prolonged opioid use significantly constrain dosage in the clinical setting. Recently, researchers have concentrated on the development of biased opioid receptor agonists that preferentially activate the G protein signaling pathway over β-arrestin signaling. This approach is based on the hypothesis that G protein signaling mediates analgesic effects, whereas β-arrestin signaling is implicated in adverse side effects. Although certain studies have demonstrated that the absence or inhibition of β-arrestin signaling can mitigate the incidence of side effects, recent research appears to challenge these earlier findings. In-depth investigations into biased signal transduction of opioid receptor agonists have been conducted, potentially offering novel insights for the development of biased opioid receptors. Consequently, this review elucidates the contradictory roles of β-arrestin signaling in the adverse reactions associated with opioid receptor activation. Furthermore, a comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the classic G protein-biased agonists, TRV130 and PZM21, relative to the traditional non-biased agonist morphine. This review aims to inform the development of novel analgesic drugs that can optimize therapeutic efficacy and safety, while minimizing adverse reactions to the greatest extent possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.