ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Optimization and Benchmarking of RT-LAMP-CRISPR-Cas12a for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Saliva.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resource-limited settings and supply chain difficulties faced throughout the COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development of rapid and alternative methods of detecting SARS-CoV-2. These methods include reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), reverse-transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA), and CRISPR-Cas12a fluorescence detection. We describe RT-LAMP, RT-RPA, and CRISPR-Cas12a assays for the detection of the N and E-gene amplicons of SARS-CoV-2 and the optimization of various assay components, including incubation temperatures, Cas12a enzymes, reporter molecules, and the use of a lyophilized RT-LAMP master mix. We also describe the testing of a one-tube RT-LAMP-CRISPR-Cas12a assay. The one-tube assay showed promise in reducing hands-on time and improving time-to-result. We found no improvements in assay sensitivity with RT-RPA, but did achieve detection at a lower copy number with the lyophilized RT-LAMP master mix compared to liquid reagent (50 vs. 100 copies at 20 min). When used to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical saliva samples from 75 infected patients, the discriminatory ability of the optimized RT-LAMP-CRISPR Cas12a assay was found to be comparable with RT-qPCR, with a minor reduction in sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.