Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40076289›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Model and Process Optimization for the Treatment of Drilling Wastewater Using Electrocoagulation.

Muhammed Kamil Öden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammed Kamil ÖdenDepartment of Environmental Protection Technology, Sarayönü Vocational High School, Selcuk University, 42430 Konya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0573-5634

Funding

Selçuk University 20401047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction of underground resources has accelerated globally, in response to the demands of advancing technology and the rapidly growing population. The increase in drilling activities has caused an increase in environmental pollution problems caused by waste generated during drilling activities, namely drilling sludge and drilling wastewater. In this study, the treatability of wastewater generated during drilling operations in a basin, where an underground gas storage area was created, was investigated using an electrocoagulation (EC) process, using different electrode pairs. The removal efficiencies of the pollution parameters were determined using the response surface method. The wastewater parameters included different organic and inorganic pollutants, such as sodium, chloride, magnesium, and chemical oxygen demand (COD). The concentrations of sodium, chloride, and COD in drilling industry wastewater were found to be very high, at 128,567, 185,292, and 7500 mg/L, respectively. The data obtained in this study yielded a removal efficiency of approximately 65% and above. Sodium achieved the highest pollutant removal efficiency of 85% and above. The statistical values were interpreted for all the pollutants and the suitability of second-degree regression was observed.

Indexed as

drilling wastewaterelectrocoagulationFe–Cu electroderesponse surface methodwastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID40076289
PMCPMC11901756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.