ArticlePolymers2025
Experimental Design (2
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aliphatic unsegmented polyurethanes (PUs) have garnered relatively limited attention in the literature, despite their valuable properties such as UV resistance and biocompatibility, making them suitable for biomedical applications. This study focuses on synthesizing poly(ester-urethanes) (PEUs) using 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate and the macrodiol α,ω-hydroxy telechelic poly(ε-caprolactone) (HOPCLOH). To optimize the synthesis, a statistical experimental design approach was employed, a methodology not commonly utilized in polymer science. The influence of reaction temperature, time, reagent concentrations, and solvent type on the resulting PEUs was investigated. Characterization techniques included FT-IR,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.