ArticlePolymers2025
Preservation of Soil Ruins After High Temperatures: Water Absorption and Compressive Strength.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil ruins hold historical significance and serve as witnesses to past civilizations. High temperatures cause soil moisture to evaporate and soil to shrink, leading to cracking issues and making preservation a global challenge. P(AA-AM-AMPS) (Acrylic acid -Acrylamide-2-Acrylamide-2-methy-propenesulfonic acid) composites solve this problem by combining absorbent materials with loess. In this study, P(AA-AM-AMPS) was prepared using a solution method. The water absorption, water retention, air permeability, and compressive strength of P(AA-AM-AMPS) in loess were studied. The results show that after adding P(AA-AM-AMPS) to loess, there is no obvious color difference compared with the blank sample, and the air permeability of the reinforced loess is basically the same as that of the blank soil. After aging resistance tests, the surface cracking of soil clods is significantly reduced compared to that of the blank samples, and their compressive strength improved from 1.8 N/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.