ArticlePolymers2025
Development and Evaluation of a Polymer Composite Material Reinforced by Tectona Grandis Fiber, with Static Analysis.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research seeks to investigate the viability of using Tectona grandis wood powder as a reinforcement material in polymer matrix composites because of the increasing awareness of natural fibers that offer impressive characteristics and cost-effectiveness in addition to being biodegradable. The fibers were mixed with epoxy resin, and the mixture was passed through a filter to remove fiber bundles and then compression molded to form composites, which were cured in an oven. Different experiments were performed on the composite to measure its mechanical characteristics. The tests performed were a tensile test to measure the mechanical properties of the material like strength and elastic properties, a compression test for evaluating the behavior of the material under a compressive load, a hardness test for the rate of indentation resistivity, and an impact test for the material's ability to withstand shock loads. The results showed that fiber reinforcement caused a significant enhancement in the mechanical aspect of the composite, where the compression strength obtained was 249.83 MPa, and the tensile strength obtained was 17.98 MPa. SEM microstructural analysis and a moisture absorption test were performed, while an additional analysis was carried out using Ansys work bench software. This research proves that Tectona grandis wood powder improves the mechanical properties of polymer composites and represents a viable substitute for synthetic reinforcements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.