ArticlePolymers2025
Eco-Friendly Biocomposites from Chestnut Waste: Production, Optimization, Characterization, and Application.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Waste to Value: Fruit Biofillers in Biodegradable Composite Materials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the valorization of non-commercial chestnut waste from the Portuguese chestnut industry to develop biocomposites. The composites were obtained by hot compression molding, and a Box-Behnken Design model was employed to optimize the mechanical, thermal, and water resistance properties of the chestnut-based composite, using fruit and shell fibers, respectively, as the polymeric matrix and reinforcement agent. The optimal formulation, comprising 70% chestnut, no glycerol, a molding temperature of 120 °C, and applying a pressure of 2.93 MPa for 30 min, achieved a Flexural Strength of 9.00 MPa and a Flexural Modulus of 950 MPa. To enhance water resistance, shellac was added as a natural hydrophobic coating. Water interaction tests indicated that shellac-treated biocomposites exhibited superior water resistance, absorbing approximately two times less water than those containing glycerol or untreated samples. Thermal analysis revealed that glycerol acted as a plasticizer, improving flexibility and reducing the glass transition temperature. Additionally, the chestnut-based biocomposite demonstrated an out-of-plane thermal conductivity of 0.79 W/m·K, categorizing it as a thermal insulator. The final prototype application was a candle holder, showcasing the potential for the practical and sustainable use of chestnut-based composite. This research highlights the potential for chestnut waste to be repurposed into eco-friendly products, offering an alternative to conventional plastics and contributing to a circular economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.