ReviewPolymers2025
Proposal of a Modular Classification System for Direct Dental Resin Composites Based on Clinical Applications.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double-Stamp Technique With Internal Resin Staining for Enhanced Esthetic Outcomes.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Color stability of different aligner attachment composites following exposure to conventional and electronic cigarette smoke.Odontology · 2026Article
- Polymerization shrinkage and stress of highly filled flowable resin composites used to perform definitive restorations.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties of Different Universal-Shade Resin Composites After Simulated Aging.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Commercial trends in universal adhesive evolution: updated formulations do not consistently improve dentin bond strength after aging compared with predecessors and a multistep reference.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fracture behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect restorations: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
- Types of Resin Composite and Filling Techniques: How They Affect Internal Void Volume and Compressive Strength.Polymers · 2026Article
- Battle of the Bonds: Training's Impact on Dental Adhesive Use in Undergraduate and Continuing Education.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Assessment of Color Stability of Various Flowable Composite Resins with Different Viscosities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adhesive-resin composite pair has been the cornerstone of direct restorations in dentistry for many years. Resin composites are traditionally classified in three ways based on their inorganic structure, their organic composition and their viscosity. While these classifications have long been associated with the optical, mechanical, and clinical properties of resin composites, recent studies indicate that this classification is not always valid. In recent years, a significant expansion of the range of clinical resin composite families has occurred, each with varying degrees of validation through in vitro and clinical studies. As a result, new resin composites with distinct structures, viscosities, and clinical indications have emerged. Despite this progress, a formal classification of the clinical features of all resin composites is still lacking, leading to terminological inconsistencies in research and potential confusion among clinicians. This brief review, supported by an exhaustive search of the dental literature, proposes a new clinical classification system for resin composites based on their key clinical features to help clinicians and researchers easily identify the key clinical characteristics of formulations. This modular classification, encompassing eight main families and 14 characteristics, is particularly suited to future developments, as current trends aim to simplify procedures by integrating multiple formulations into single products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.