Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40076014›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Why Are Some Snakes More Terrifying and What Is Behind the Fear?

Daniel Frynta, Markéta Janovcová, Hassan Sh Abdirahman Elmi, Iveta Štolhoferová, Veronika Rudolfová, Kateřina Rexová, David Sommer, David Král, Daniel Alex Berti, Eva Landová and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel FryntaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1375-7972
Markéta JanovcováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7647-8148
Hassan Sh Abdirahman ElmiDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-8170
Iveta ŠtolhoferováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-0499
Veronika RudolfováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-5648
Kateřina RexováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
David SommerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4519-9677
David KrálDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7930-1927
Daniel Alex BertiDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva LandováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-8710
Petra FrýdlováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9385-9743

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 20-21608S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakes are stimuli inducing an ancestral fear response in humans and other primates. Certain snakes evoke more subjective fear than others. True vipers are high-fear-eliciting snakes for both African and European respondents. This can be explained by the evolutionary experience of human ancestors in Africa. The question arises as to how snakes living in the Americas and Australia, with which humans have no evolutionary experience, will be evaluated. While these snakes belong to broader taxonomic groups that have distant relatives in the Old World, they have evolved independently for tens of millions of years. We prepared a set of 32 pictures depicting eight American pit vipers, eight Australian elapids, eight constrictors, and eight colubrids and asked the respondents to rank these stimuli according to the fear these snakes evoke. Here, we show a high cross-cultural agreement between evaluations by African and European respondents. Snakes characterized by a robust body shape, such as American pit vipers, Australian death adders, pythons, and boas, were the most fear-evoking. The body width was the strongest predictor of evoked fear. The contribution of coloration and pattern of the stimulus to the fear response was not proved. This supports the view that the patterns of fear are not dependent on direct experience, but its underlying mechanisms are shared cross-culturally.

Indexed as

Boidaecross-cultural comparisonElapidaeevolutionary psychologyfearophidiophobiaViperidae

Identifiers

PMID40076014
PMCPMC11898634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.