Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075921›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Genetic Analysis of Litter Size Across Parities in Prolific and Conventional Populations of Tunisian Barbarine Sheep Using a Random Regression Model.

Chiraz Ziadi, Juan Manuel Serradilla, Sonia Bedhiaf-Romdhani, Antonio Molina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chiraz ZiadiDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Ctra, Madrid-Cádiz, km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-7028
Juan Manuel SerradillaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Ctra, Madrid-Cádiz, km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Sonia Bedhiaf-RomdhaniLaboratoire des Productions Animales et Fourragères, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie, Rue Hédi Karray, Ariana 2049, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-8602-9474
Antonio MolinaDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Ctra, Madrid-Cádiz, km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9566-6600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Litter size records from two lines of Tunisian Barbarine sheep were analysed across parities using an RRM. A total of 2751 and 2562 litter records from the first to the sixth parity from the prolific and the conventional lines, respectively, were included in the analysis. The total number of animals in the pedigree was 1277 for the prolific line and 1102 for the conventional line. The estimation of genetic parameters was based on Bayesian inference under categorical distribution. Fixed effects included the year and month of lambing and a fixed quadratic regression coefficient for the lambing number with Legendre polynomials. The random additive and permanent environmental effects were modelled by second-order Legendre polynomials. Heritability ranged from 0.04 to 0.18 for the prolific line and from 0.17 to 0.39 for the conventional line. Genetic correlations within trait through parities showed a wide range of values, from 0.25 to 0.96 for the prolific line and from zero to 0.93 for the conventional line. Due to the changes in the variances and the genetic correlations different from unity across parities, the use of an RRM is recommended to analyse litter size in the Barbarine sheep.

Indexed as

Legendre polynomialslitter sizeparityrandom regression modelsheep

Identifiers

PMID40075921
PMCPMC11898132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.