Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075786›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.

Hojka Rowbottom, Tomaž Šmigoc, Janez Ravnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hojka RowbottomDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Tomaž ŠmigocDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8988-855X
Janez RavnikDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas account for approximately 40% of all primary brain tumors, of which 1.5% are classified as grade 3. Whilst meningiomas are discovered on imaging with high-grade meningiomas being associated with certain imaging features, the final diagnosis is based on histopathology in combination with molecular markers. According to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), grade 3 should be assigned based on criteria for anaplastic meningiomas, which comprise malignant cytomorphology (anaplasia) that resembles carcinoma, high-grade sarcoma or melanoma; elevated mitotic activity; a TERT promoter mutation and/or a homozygous CDKN2A and/or CDKN2B deletion. Surgery remains the mainstay treatment modality for grade 3 meningiomas, followed by radiotherapy. Limited data are available on the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapy for grade 3 meningiomas; however, studies are underway. Despite optimal treatment, the estimated recurrence rate ranges between 50% and 95% with a 5-year survival rate of 66% and a 10-year estimated survival rate of 14% to 24%.

Indexed as

adjuvant radiotherapyDNS methylation profilinggeneticsmalignant meningiomasPET SSTR ligandsSimpson grade

Identifiers

PMID40075786
PMCPMC11898517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.