ReviewCancers2025
Oncogenic Mutations and the Tumor Microenvironment: Drivers of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progression.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Validation of Tissue and Liquid Companion Diagnostics for BRAF V600E Detection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers from the PHAROS Study.Cancer research communications · 2026Trial
- Metal-phenolic networks: a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Lung Cancer Based on Machine Learning and Immune Microenvironment Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Inflammatory Pathways and Immune Microenvironment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Multi-Dimensional Analysis and Machine Learning Prediction.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Cadherin family genes in non-small cell lung cancer: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and targeted therapy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Tumor microenvironment in squamous cell lung cancer - histological and immunohistochemical study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Ex vivo use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in lung cancer visualization: an ex vivo pilot study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. The study focuses on understanding the interplay between genetic mutations, cancer stem cells (CSCs), and the tumor microenvironment (TME) in driving NSCLC progression, resistance to therapies, and relapse.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus databases to identify significant and valuable studies relevant to NSCLC, focusing on genetic mutations, CSCs, and the TME. Articles were selected based on their relevance, methodological severity, date of publication, and scientific soundness related to NSCLC biology and therapeutic strategies. This review synthesized findings from these sources to highlight key mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions.
resultsMutations in critical genes in
conclusionsThe association between genetic alterations, CSCs, the TME, and other cellular pathways-including cell metabolism and immune evasion-plays a crucial role in therapy resistance, highlighting the need for comprehensive treatment strategies. The combination of genomic profiling with TME-targeting therapies could lead to personalized treatment approaches, offering hope for better clinical outcomes and reduced mortality in NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.