Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075670›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Effectiveness and Toxicity of Cemiplimab Therapy for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Skin Cancer in a Community Oncology Practice.

Tina Fung, Wolfram Samlowski, Raul Meoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina FungKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA.
Wolfram SamlowskiKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-914X
Raul MeozComprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89148, USA.

Funding

SOUTHERN NEVADA CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION-CCOPU10CA035421 · NCI · SOUTHERN NEVADA CANCER RESEARCH FDN · PI ELLERTON, JOHN A · 1985 to 2014
$9.8M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035421US National Institutes of Health 5U10CA035421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab has significant clinical activity in unresectable and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. There are limited real-world data available to assess the outcome of cemiplimab treatment in patients in a community practice setting.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes following cemiplimab treatment (350 mg IV every 3 weeks) of squamous cell skin cancer. An exploratory analysis was performed to evaluate patient subsets, including patients with locally advanced disease, regional or distant metastases, and "too numerous to count" primaries. Another small group of patients who did not respond to the initial four doses of cemiplimab were evaluated following added radiotherapy.

resultsOf the 36 patients treated, 22 (61.1%) achieved complete remission, 10 (27.8%) experienced a partial response, 3 (8.3%) had stable disease, and 1 (2.8%) developed progressive disease. The median progression-free survival for the entire cohort was over 33 months. Overall, cemiplimab was well-tolerated, with no hospitalizations due to treatment-related toxicity.

conclusionsCemiplimab produced complete remissions in over 60% of patients with locally advanced and metastatic squamous cell skin cancers, allowing elective treatment discontinuation. Addition of radiotherapy in cemiplimab-refractory patients appeared to increase tumor responsiveness. In contrast, patients with TNTC primary tumors frequently develop new primary skin cancers. Thus, improved treatment options for this patient subset are still needed.

Indexed as

checkpoint inhibitorkeratinocyte carcinomasquamous cell skin cancer

Identifiers

PMID40075670
PMCPMC11899135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.