Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075662›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Multi-Center Benchmarking of a Commercially Available Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score Assignment and Lesion Detection in Prostate MRI.

Benedict Oerther, Hannes Engel, Caroline Wilpert, Andrea Nedelcu, August Sigle, Robert Grimm, Heinrich von Busch, Christopher L Schlett, Fabian Bamberg, Matthias Benndorf and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Benedict OertherDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Hannes EngelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1985-325X
Caroline WilpertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-2478
Andrea NedelcuDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
August SigleDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6857-8149
Robert GrimmResearch & Clinical Translation, Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthineers AG, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-8215
Heinrich von BuschDigital & Automation Innovation, Siemens Healthineers AG, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0469-1622
Christopher L SchlettDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias BenndorfDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Judith HerrmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-8980
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-7325
Bastian AmendDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-8904
Christian BolenzDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Christopher KlothDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Meinrad BeerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Daniel VogeleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6421-1400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) examinations as a fundamental tool in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics raises the need for supportive computer-aided imaging analysis. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of a commercially available AI-based algorithm for prostate cancer detection and classification in a multi-center setting.

methodsRepresentative patients with 3T mpMRI between 2017 and 2022 at three different university hospitals were selected. Exams were read according to the PI-RADSv2.1 protocol and then assessed by an AI algorithm. Diagnostic accuracy for PCa of both human and AI readings were calculated using MR-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy as the gold standard.

resultsAnalysis of 91 patients resulted in 138 target lesions. Median patient age was 67 years (range: 49-82), median PSA at the time of the MRI exam was 8.4 ng/mL (range: 1.47-73.7). Sensitivity and specificity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as ISUP ≥ 2) were 92%/64% for radiologists vs. 91%/57% for AI detection on patient level and 90%/70% vs. 81%/78% on lesion level, respectively (cut-off PI-RADS ≥ 4). Two cases of csPCa were missed by the AI on patient-level, resulting in a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.88 at a cut-off of PI-RADS ≥ 3.

conclusionsAI-augmented lesion detection and scoring proved to be a robust tool in a multi-center setting with sensitivity comparable to the radiologists, even outperforming human reader specificity on both patient and lesion levels at a threshold of PI-RADS ≥3 and a threshold of PI-RADS ≥ 4 on lesion level. In anticipation of refinements of the algorithm and upon further validation, AI-detection could be implemented in the clinical workflow prior to human reading to exclude PCa, thereby drastically improving reading efficiency.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemulti-center studymultiparametric MRIPI-RADSv2.1prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40075662
PMCPMC11899360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.