ReviewCancers2025
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibition in Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Castration-resistant prostate cancer cells are addicted to the high activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 2.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of Genomic Mutations on the Transcriptional Pathways and Tumor Microenvironment Landscape of Localized Early Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2026Article
- CDK4-selective inhibitor AU2-94 for the treatment of advanced and therapy-resistant prostate cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- α-Mangostin from the mangosteen (Journal of medicinally active plants · 2025Article
- Comparative study of the chemical profile, cytotoxic activity, and molecular docking of Serenoa repens extract and a pharmaceutical product.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Targeting Transcriptional Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Review
- Bone metastases from endocrine cancer: advances in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy: Time to Move Beyond Checkpoint Inhibitors.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant progress, prostate cancer remains a leading cause of death. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, which are already approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, are undergoing extensive testing as monotherapy and in various combinations as a potentially valuable treatment modality in prostate cancer patients. Thus far, a limited number of these studies have published results, which have been largely disappointing. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we describe the biologic rationale for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in prostate cancer, the existing clinical data describing their use in prostate cancer, and ongoing clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination for the treatment of prostate cancer. In particular, we focus on possible resistance mechanisms that may be particularly relevant in prostate cancer patients, leading to de novo and acquired resistance, and we highlight novel strategies that can overcome this resistance.
conclusionsCurrent clinical trials are actively working to (1) refine the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in prostate cancer patients; (2) develop new inhibitors of other cell-cycle targets, such as CDK2 and CDK7; and (3) explore novel combination therapies with inhibitors of other relevant pathways, such as PI3K or MAPK. Further genomic subtyping of advanced prostate cancer will likely shed light on the subsets of patients most likely to benefit from cell-cycle-targeted agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.