ReviewCancers2025
Cancer Risk in IBD Patients Treated with JAK Inhibitors: Reassuring Evidence from Trials and Real-World Data.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a single-center retrospective study.Intestinal research · 2026Article
- Positioning and sequencing of advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: A guide for clinical practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, has significantly widened the therapeutic options for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These agents offer the advantage of oral administration and have demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission. However, concerns regarding their safety have emerged, particularly concerning cardiovascular and infectious complications, which appear more pronounced in patients with pre-existing risk factors such as older age, smoking, or comorbidities. While these risks are better understood, the potential association between JAK inhibitors and malignancies remains a subject of ongoing investigation. Current data from randomised controlled trials, pooled and integrated analyses, and real-world studies provide conflicting evidence regarding cancer risk. Notably, studies in patients with rheumatologic diseases treated with JAK inhibitors have contributed additional insights into long-term safety outcomes. Despite the uncertainty surrounding malignancy risks, it is likely that predisposing factors, including older age, smoking history, and long-standing IBD with chronic inflammation, play a more substantial role in cancer development than JAK inhibitor therapy alone. This paper reviews safety data from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies, focusing on cancer risk in patients treated with JAK inhibitors for IBD. We also review evidence from rheumatology studies, highlighting the need for individualised risk assessment and close monitoring to optimise the safety profile of these medications in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.