Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075572›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Why the MARS2 Trial Does Not Mean the End of All Mesothelioma Surgery.

David Waller, Rocco Bilancia, Luigi Ventura, Sara Tenconi, Laura Socci, Andrea Bille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pleural mesothelioma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David WallerSt Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Rocco BilanciaGolden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4DY, UK.
Luigi VenturaNorthern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-0578
Sara TenconiNorthern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.
Laura SocciNorthern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.
Andrea BilleGuy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe published report of the MARS2 trial suggested that the addition of extended pleurectomy/decortication to chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma was harmful. Thus, the report goes on, all disease should be considered as unresectable and no further mesothelioma surgery for survival benefit should be considered. This statement has changed clinical practice in the UK; however, the design of the MARS2 trial has several limitations which should prevent its conclusions being over interpreted. These limitations include the following: the inclusion of too many patients who would fall outside contemporary selection criteria including age, co-morbidity and histology; the unnecessary resection of too much tissue, particularly the diaphragm, and operating on patients too late in the disease process due to less than rigorous staging.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed the selection and outcome of data of 79 of the 158 (50%) patients who underwent surgery in the surgical arm of the MARS2 study who were operated by the authors in four of the five trial surgical centres. We revised the clinical staging of these patients by applying the criteria in the forthcoming 9th TNM edition including the measurement of pleural thickness.

resultsBased on reported guidelines, the selection for surgery was reset as stage I or II epithelioid PM. We found that 52 (66%) of these patients (group A) would not have been considered for surgery using contemporary selection criteria for the following reasons: non-epithelioid PM in 5; cT/4 in 35; cT2N1 in 10 and 2 cT2N0 (pN1), which would have been detected on preoperative mediastinal biopsy. Of the 27 (34%) trial patients fulfilling current criteria (group B), 12 were cT1N0, 1 was cT1N1, 6 were cT1N0pN1 and 8 were cT2N0, all with epithelioid PM. The median survival of group B was 32 (1-72) months, which was significantly higher than in group A: 8.5 (1-55) months,

conclusionsAs contemporary selection criteria were not applied in MARS2, its conclusions cannot be universally applied to all those with PM. Together with the favourable postoperative survival in this selected group, we suggest that there is still scope for a further trial of surgery in early-stage epithelioid mesothelioma.

Indexed as

pleural mesotheliomapleurectomy/decorticationsurgical trials

Identifiers

PMID40075572
PMCPMC11899383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.