Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075562›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

AI Model for Predicting Anti-PD1 Response in Melanoma Using Multi-Omics Biomarkers.

Axel Gschwind, Stephan Ossowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. When evidence meets artificial intelligence.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Axel GschwindInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1181-0335
Stephan OssowskiInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significantly improved clinical efficacy in a minority of patients with advanced melanoma, whereas non-responders potentially suffer from severe side effects and delays in other treatment options. Predicting the response to anti-PD1 treatment in melanoma remains a challenge because the current FDA-approved gold standard, the nonsynonymous tumor mutation burden (nsTMB), offers limited accuracy.

methodsIn this study, we developed a multi-omics-based machine learning model that integrates genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers to predict the response to anti-PD1 treatment in patients with advanced melanoma. We employed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 49 biomarkers extracted from tumor-normal whole-exome and RNA sequencing as input features. The performance of the multi-omics AI model was thoroughly compared to that of nsTMB alone and to models that use only genomic or transcriptomic biomarkers.

resultsWe used publicly available DNA and RNA-seq datasets of melanoma patients for the training and validation of our model, forming a meta-cohort of 449 patients for which the outcome was recorded as a RECIST score. The model substantially improved the prediction of anti-PD1 outcomes compared to nsTMB alone, with an ROC AUC of 0.7 in the training set and an ROC AUC of 0.64 in the test set. Using SHAP values, we demonstrated the explainability of the model's predictions on a per-sample basis.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that models using only RNA-seq or multi-omics biomarkers outperformed nsTMB in predicting the response of melanoma patients to ICI. Furthermore, our machine learning approach improves clinical usability by providing explanations of its predictions on a per-patient basis. Our findings underscore the utility of multi-omics data for selecting patients for treatment with anti-PD1 drugs. However, to train clinical-grade AI models for routine applications, prospective studies collecting larger melanoma cohorts with consistent application of exome and RNA sequencing are required.

Indexed as

anti-PD1artificial intelligenceexplainable machine learninggenomicsimmune checkpoint inhibitorsleast absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)melanomamulti-omicsSHAP valuestranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40075562
PMCPMC11899402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.