ArticleJournal of clinical apheresis2025
Gender Composition of Invited Speakers and Session Chairs at American Society for Apheresis Annual Meetings Between 2019 and 2024.
Article in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disparities persist throughout medicine, including among conference speakership invitations. The National Institutes of Health have highlighted the importance of diversity at academic conferences. We assessed the gender composition of speakers at the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) annual meeting. We assessed all session chairs and speakers at the annual ASFA meeting from 2019 to 2024. Two authors independently assessed individuals' genders. The primary outcome was the gender composition of all session chairs and speakers by position. Subset analyzes were performed to assess the gender composition of unique individuals (i.e., examining the total number of unique men and women, independent of the number of sessions at which they spoke) and by professional degree. 820 positions (665 speaker positions and 155 chair positions) were identified; women comprised significantly more positions than men [64.3%, 528/820 (95% CI 61.1%-67.6%) vs. 35.6% 292/820 (32.4%-38.9%); p < 0.0001]. 52.7% (432/820) of all session positions were held by physicians, with no significant difference in the gender composition [women 47.5%, 205/432 (42.8%-52.2%) vs. men 52.6%, 227/432 (47.8%-57.2%); p = 0.31]. When limited to unique physician individuals, women were significantly outnumbered by men [40.1%, 71/177 (33.2%-47.5%) vs. 59.9%, 106/177 (52.5%-66.8%); p = 0.01]. This analysis demonstrated mixed findings, with more women across all positions overall but significantly more men when limited to unique physicians. Diversity in conference positions begets a broader array of perspectives, knowledge, and expertise, and can aid in realizing greater diversity in related areas. Thus, academic conference diversity should be prioritized and thoughtfully pursued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.