ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Pilot implementation of short message service for randomisation in a multisite pragmatic factorial clinical trial in Kenya.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid, effective, and affordable randomisation for emergency neonatal research in a low-resource setting: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe traditional use of sealed envelopes for randomisation is susceptible to manipulation and the risk of damage to envelopes during shipping and storage. Additionally, the filling and sealing of envelopes are tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. Other randomisation alternatives such as web-based methods are preferred. However, they are expensive and unsuitable in settings with poor internet infrastructure. Mobile phone-based randomisation using short message service (SMS) potentially offers a low-cost and reliable alternative.
methodsWe developed an SMS-based method for random allocation of treatments. Plain text messaging or an Android app was used to formulate text messages using a fixed syntax consisting of the participant's unique identifier, trial site, stratum, and the trial name as input parameters. The system verified the input parameters and obtained an allocation from the database before returning a response to the sender. The text response contained the details of the treatment allocation. This was a Study Within A Trial (SWAT) conducted in two sites of a multi-site 3 × 2 factorial clinical trial in Kenya involving two interventions with up to nine possible allocations. SMS randomisation feasibility was assessed by comparing treatment allocations against the master randomisation list for each processed SMS, measuring SMS latency (in seconds), and gathering user feedback via a post-implementation survey.
resultsA total of 218 participants were randomised between the 7th of February 2022 and the 11th of April 2022, out of which 179 were randomised to only one arm while 39 were randomised to both treatment arms. Allocation accuracy was 100%. Median latency was 22 s with the fastest message processed in 10 s and the slowest (non-network delayed) message processed in 2129 s. Four users completed a post-implementation survey.
conclusionsThe pilot study demonstrated that SMS randomisation is easy, user-friendly, fast, accurate, and a feasible alternative randomisation technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.