ReviewPorcine health management2025
Part II: understanding pain in pigs-pain assessment in pigs with spontaneously occurring diseases or injuries.
Review in Porcine health management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Criteria for timely euthanasia of compromised pigs based on expert opinion and longitudinal data collection on farm.Porcine health management · 2026Article
- Retrospective pig welfare assessment at rendering plants - a useful tool for monitoring and inspection.Porcine health management · 2026Article
- Editorial: from Brambell to beyond: advancing pig welfare through the five freedoms framework.Porcine health management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain in pigs needs to be managed and treated to the benefit of individual pigs. It is imperative for veterinarians and farmers to assure that pigs do not suffer from unnecessary pain that can be relieved. This review focusses on pain related to spontaneously occurring diseases and injuries since this topic is often neglected. The aim is to identify ways to accelerate knowledge and evidence in this area to prevent painful conditions in pigs in the future.
methodsA scoping review was conducted with results from a search of the electronic databases VetSearch and CABI Rxiv. The findings of selected publications are narratively synthesized and reported orienting on the PRISMA ScR guideline.
resultsThe results emphasize that pigs experience pain due to spontaneously occurring diseases and injuries, but systematic knowledge about this topic is scarce. More research is especially needed for rare diseases (such as UTIs). Moreover, research conducted about the topic pain in pigs should involve standardized protocols to document, analyse and share results on pain detection beyond a projects' timeframe. The findings of this review suggest that such a protocol would comprise validated pain identification measures over time and in relation to administered pain treatment.
conclusionThe results of this study invite veterinary practitioners to reconsider in each pig patient whether pain and related indicators are present, how to handle the situation and document the process to ensure the welfare of individual compromised pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.