Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075408›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Predicting total healthcare demand using machine learning: separate and combined analysis of predisposing, enabling, and need factors.

Fatih Orhan, Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fivefold Cross-Validation Approach in Evaluating the Robustness of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Esophageal Cancer.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatih OrhanUniversity of Health Sciences, Gülhane Vocational School of Health, Ankara, Turkey. fatih.orhan@sbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-1961
Mehmet Nurullah KurutkanDepartment of Health Management, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-4231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePredicting healthcare demand is essential for effective resource allocation and planning. This study applies Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, focusing on predisposing, enabling, and need factors, using data from the 2022 Turkey Health Survey by TUIK. Machine learning methods provide a powerful approach to analyze these factors and their combined impact on healthcare utilization, offering valuable insights for health policy.

methodsSeven different machine learning models-Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosting-were utilized. Feature selection was conducted to identify the most significant factors influencing healthcare demand. The models were evaluated for accuracy and generalization ability using performance metrics such as recall, precision, F1 score, and ROC AUC.

resultsThe study identified key features affecting healthcare demand. For predisposing factors, gender, educational level, and age group were significant. Enabling factors included treatment costs, community interest, and payment difficulties. Need factors were influenced by smoking status, chronic diseases, and overall health status. The models demonstrated high recall (approximately 0.90) and strong F1 scores (ranging from 0.87 to 0.88), indicating a balanced performance between precision and recall. Among the models, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression consistently outperformed others, achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Random Forest and SVM also performed well, showing robust classification capability.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the effectiveness of machine learning methods in predicting healthcare demand, providing valuable insights for health policy and resource allocation. Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression emerged as the most reliable models, demonstrating superior generalization and classification performance. Understanding the separate and combined effects of predisposing, enabling, and need factors on healthcare demand can contribute to more efficient and data-driven healthcare planning, facilitating strategic decision-making in resource allocation and service delivery.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedTurkeyYoung AdultAndersen behavioral modelFeature selectionHealthcare demandHealth services utilizationMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID40075408
PMCPMC11900254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.