ArticleBMC health services research2025
Predicting total healthcare demand using machine learning: separate and combined analysis of predisposing, enabling, and need factors.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modeling Diabetes Risk and Progression With Public Health Data: Ontology-Guided, Simulation-Capable Digital Twin Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Modeling and forecasting neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: a comparative study using statistical, machine learning, and deep learning approaches.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Feasibility of short-term hospital mask demand forecasting using a backpropagation neural network under data scarcity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic demand forecasting and capacity assessment for emergency care system: a hybrid time series and machine learning approach with evidence from Beijing.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Fivefold Cross-Validation Approach in Evaluating the Robustness of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Esophageal Cancer.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026Article
- OSH inspector ratio to strengthen decent workplace safety and health: a cross-regional trend analysis research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Integrating machine learning and statistical analysis to forecast insufficient physical activity trends using socio-demographic predictors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Epidemiological Assessment of Depression, Activities of Daily Living and Associated Factors in Elderly Individuals Aged 65 Years and Older: Evidence from a Population-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning reveals multifactorial drivers of early intracranial hematoma progression in traumatic brain injury: development of a SHAP-guided SVM nomogram.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePredicting healthcare demand is essential for effective resource allocation and planning. This study applies Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, focusing on predisposing, enabling, and need factors, using data from the 2022 Turkey Health Survey by TUIK. Machine learning methods provide a powerful approach to analyze these factors and their combined impact on healthcare utilization, offering valuable insights for health policy.
methodsSeven different machine learning models-Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosting-were utilized. Feature selection was conducted to identify the most significant factors influencing healthcare demand. The models were evaluated for accuracy and generalization ability using performance metrics such as recall, precision, F1 score, and ROC AUC.
resultsThe study identified key features affecting healthcare demand. For predisposing factors, gender, educational level, and age group were significant. Enabling factors included treatment costs, community interest, and payment difficulties. Need factors were influenced by smoking status, chronic diseases, and overall health status. The models demonstrated high recall (approximately 0.90) and strong F1 scores (ranging from 0.87 to 0.88), indicating a balanced performance between precision and recall. Among the models, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression consistently outperformed others, achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Random Forest and SVM also performed well, showing robust classification capability.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the effectiveness of machine learning methods in predicting healthcare demand, providing valuable insights for health policy and resource allocation. Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression emerged as the most reliable models, demonstrating superior generalization and classification performance. Understanding the separate and combined effects of predisposing, enabling, and need factors on healthcare demand can contribute to more efficient and data-driven healthcare planning, facilitating strategic decision-making in resource allocation and service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.