Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075381›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Household predictors of malaria episode in northern Uganda: its implication for future malaria control.

Richard Echodu, William Sam Oyet, Tereza Iwiru, Felister Apili, Julius Julian Lutwama, Elizabeth Auma Opiyo, Ochan Otim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard EchoduDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu City, Uganda. richardechodu2009@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1979-1012
William Sam OyetDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu City, Uganda.
Tereza IwiruGulu University Multifunctional Research Laboratories, P. O. Box 166, Gulu City, Uganda.
Felister ApiliDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, P. O. Box 1035, Lira City, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-3539
Julius Julian LutwamaDepartment of Arbovirology, Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases, Uganda Virus Research Institute, P. O. Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda.
Elizabeth Auma OpiyoDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu City, Uganda.
Ochan OtimDepartment of Health Sciences and Sciences, University of California, City of Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-4356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUses of indoor residual spraying (IRS), long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINS) and treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) are greatly promoted in the northern part of Uganda as mitigating strategies for malaria episodes. Unfortunately, the region remains the fourth highest malaria burden in Uganda with a prevalence of 12%. This study assesses household predictors of malaria episodes in northern Uganda and their impact on malaria episodes at the household level.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in four districts of Gulu, Oyam, Kitgum and Agago covering sixteen villages in northern Uganda. Data was collected through a pre-tested structured questionnaire and systematically coded for analysis using R software.

resultsIn total, 193 households were surveyed with 112 (58%) of them headed by women and 605 individuals were declared to have spent the night before the interview in the 193 households. On average, there were at least two-bed nets (317/159) per household and a total of 460 individuals out of 535 (86%) spent the night before the interview under a bed net. The usage of bed nets in the study area overall was 86% while malaria incidence was 50% higher in children than in adults. Hierarchical clustering on principal components (HCPC) categorizes households in northern Uganda into three types: 1) households that use bed nets and sleep in houses sprayed with insecticides; 2) households that use bed nets but no indoor residual spraying with insecticides and 3) households that have no bed nets and no indoor residual spraying. When given a choice between IRS and treated bed nets, 1 in 3 households preferred treated bed nets. At the same time, data suggests that bed nets were perceived as unnecessary once the IRS was applied. If true, the driving force for spraying insecticides indoors then becomes the lack of a bed net.

conclusionsMalaria episodes were strongly related to lack of bed nets or use thereof, and directly linked to the number of individuals in a household. Children were prone to malaria more than adults by a ratio of 2:1. The three categories of households in northern Uganda as revealed by HCPC provide an opportunity to tailor-make preventive/intervention malaria messages to fit the individual household clusters.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInsecticidesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesInsecticidesIndoor residual sprayingLong-lasting insecticidal nets UgandaMalariaPredictors

Identifiers

PMID40075381
PMCPMC11905491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.