ArticleBMC medical education2025
Mentorship in surgical training; a systematic scoping review to inform a mentorship framework for ophthalmology trainees.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixed reality headset in vitreoretinal surgical teaching: a newly defined tele-mentoring model.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Mentorship in Iran's perioperative nursing training: a systematic scoping review and evidence appraisal based on the standards of the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Mentorship as metadata: clinical annotation and the limits of real-world data in oculoplastic surgery.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Narrative Mentorship and Professional Identity Formation: Reflections from a National Educational Event in Qatar.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Integrating narrative mentorship into simulation-based medical education to support professional identity formation.Qatar medical journal · 2026Article
- Factors influencing ophthalmology trainees' decision to pursue vitreoretinal surgery fellowship in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMentorship plays a vital role in surgical training. In the field of ophthalmology, effective mentorship is particularly critical due to the specialised nature of surgeries and the need for comprehensive skill development. However, the landscape of mentorship remains underexplored. Understanding key characteristics and components of effective mentorship is essential for optimising training and ensuring the success of future generations of surgeons. This scoping review aims to analyse existing literature on mentorship in surgical training and to employ Levac et al.'s enhanced methodological framework to construct a conceptual framework for a bespoke mentorship programme tailored to the needs of ophthalmology trainees.
methodsThe search strategy adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included relevant databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Selection criteria encompassed studies exploring mentorship experiences, perceptions, and outcomes across all surgical training domains. A two-step screening process was employed, followed by thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's approach. The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) assessed study quality.
resultsOf the 81 identified articles, 24 were included in the review, with an average MERSQI score of 11.65. Studies comprised randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, cohort, cross-sectional studies, and reviews. The thematic analysis identified five domains: (1) mentorship and burnout; (2) surgical skill and performance; (3) career paths and professional development; (4) diversity promotion; and (5) work-life balance.
conclusionsThis review underscores the significance of mentorship in surgical training and proposes a conceptual framework tailored to ophthalmology trainees. By synthesising existing literature and through author engagement with relevant training bodies, the study contributes to the development of an imminent mentoring programme, aiming to enhance surgical training outcomes and foster trainee well-being and professional growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.