ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Comment on: "Astigmatism in Duane Retraction Syndrome".
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent article provides valuable insights into different aspects of astigmatism in the Duane Retraction Syndrome (DRS) subtypes. The differing underlying pathophysiology in type II DRS and its higher prevalence in the mentioned study, along with possible age variations among different DRS subtypes, complicates the interpretation of the results. The mechanical forces generated by the co-contraction of the horizontal rectus muscles in patients with Duane Retraction Syndrome (DRS) may contribute to changes in the shape of the cornea, potentially leading to astigmatism. However, the exact mechanism needs further scrutiny, considering all possible contributing factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.