ArticleBMC cancer2025
The current status of cancer rehabilitation provided by palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide survey.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction to: The current status of cancer rehabilitation provided by palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide survey.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Overview of Cancer Rehabilitation Provided in Palliative Care Units in Japan: A Nationwide Survey.Physical therapy research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo our knowledge, the current status of and barriers to cancer rehabilitation in palliative care units (PCUs) in Japan remain to be elucidated. If clarified, this information could help develop rehabilitation strategies to improve the quality of life of patients with cancer who need palliative care. Hence, this study aimed to clarify the current status of and barriers to cancer rehabilitation in PCUs in Japan by conducting a nationwide questionnaire survey.
methodsThis nationwide questionnaire-based survey included 462 hospitals that met the facility criteria for PCU inpatient charges, and notified local health authorities. The questionnaire included questions on the implementation rate of cancer rehabilitation, the sufficiency/insufficiency of cancer rehabilitation and its reasons, and the reasons for and need not implement cancer rehabilitation in PCUs.
resultsAmong the 462 hospitals, we received responses from 268 hospitals (response rate: 58.0%). Cancer rehabilitation was implemented in 244 (91.0%) responding hospital PCUs. Among the implementing hospitals, 155 (63.5%) recognized cancer rehabilitation as inadequate. The main reasons for this insufficiency were ineligibility for medical fees for disease rehabilitation and a lack of rehabilitation staff. Among the non-implementing hospitals, the main reasons for not implementing cancer rehabilitation were ineligibility for medical fees for disease rehabilitation and a lack of rehabilitation staff. Of the non-implementation hospitals, 76.2% (n = 16) indicated the need for cancer rehabilitation in their PCUs.
conclusionsTo ensure sufficient and quality-assured cancer rehabilitation in PCUs, it is necessary to allocate medical fees for disease rehabilitation, provide additional reimbursements, and increase the number of rehabilitation staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.