ArticleBMC cancer2025
Identifying distinct prognostic and predictive contributions of tumor epithelium versus tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Atlas of Epithelial-Fibroblast Interactions in Colorectal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Development of an APC and TP53-based duplex sequencing assay to positively predict colorectal cancer response to anti-EGFR therapy.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Clinical and immunopathological evaluation and its comparison with IHC consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccumulating evidence has suggested that cancer progression and therapeutic response depend on both tumor epithelium (EPI) and tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the dependency of clinical outcomes on the tumor EPI vs. the TME has neither been clearly defined nor quantified.
methodsWe classified 2373 colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors into the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4) and generated the 10-gene TME
resultsThe TME
conclusionsHere we identified a pair of new, distinct 10-gene signatures (the EPI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.