ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of five Caragana.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Two Species of Wild Long-Fruited Jute (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrative chloroplast genomics of Polygonaceae: evolutionary dynamics, codon optimization, and phylogenetic resolution.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of chloroplast genome evolution in Poaceae: codon usage patterns, selection pressures, and phylogenomic relationships.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome of the salt-tolerant plantMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Plastome diversity and phylogenetic insights among modern Egyptian wheat cultivars: Genome-Wide and Gene-Level perspectives.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe genus Caragana, known for its adaptability and high forage value, is commonly planted to rehabilitate barren land and prevent desertification. Several Caragana species are also used for medicinal purposes. Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias and their primary influencing factors in chloroplast genomes aims to provide insights into molecular research and germplasm innovation for Caragana plants.
resultsThe GC content of the five Caragana species ranged from 36.00% to 37.10%, showing a preference for codons ending in A/U, although the codon bias was weak. The screening identified nine to twelve optimal codons, but their frequency of use was low. Correlation analysis, neutrality plots, ENC plots and PR2 plots of the parameters identified two potential groups among the five species: Caragana arborescens and Caragana jubata, and Caragana turkestanica, Caragana opulens and Caragana tibetica. These groups showed a high level of intragroup similarity in the parameter analyses. In the RSCU cluster tree analysis, Caragana turkestanica and Caragana arborescens grouped together, while Caragana tibetica, Caragana jubata and Caragana opulens formed a separate clade in the CDS sequence and complete sequence phylogenetic tree analysis.
conclusionsThe codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of the five Caragana species showed high similarity, suggesting that natural selection has a greater influence on codon bias than mutation. Furthermore, the identified optimal codons provide valuable insights for germplasm improvement of Caragana plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.