ArticleBMC cancer2025
Efficacy and safety of triplet regimen capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Selection of Patients and Surgical Technique.Digestive surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 5-fuorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) regimen is the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, offers a more convenient and potentially safer alternative. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the XELOXIRI regimen (capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) in Chinese patients with APC.
methodsThis real-world study evaluated consecutive patients treated with the XELOXIRI regimen as first-line chemotherapy for APC at a national cancer center in China from August 2019 to June 2024. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), and safety was assessed using adverse events (AEs).
resultsFifty-six patients were enrolled (median age, 60 years [range, 33-71]; 35 males, 21 females). Seventeen had locally advanced unresectable disease and 39 had metastatic disease. After a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the ORR was 33.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.8-47.8), disease control rate was 82.1% (95% CI: 69.6-91.1), and median response duration was 6.2 months (95% CI: 3.6-NA). Six patients with locally advanced disease and one with lung metastasis underwent R0 resection, with one achieving a pathological complete response. Median OS for the entire cohort was 16.2 months (95% CI: 10.6-23.2) and median PFS was 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.3-9.0). OS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 92.2%, 56.7%, and 35.6%, respectively; PFS rates were 53.9%, 20.2%, and 6.7%. For those who underwent R0 resection, median OS was not reached and median PFS was 12.3 months (95% CI: 11.9-NA).Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs)occurred in 94.6% of patients, with Grade 3 or higher TRAEs in 44.6%. No Grade 5 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths were observed.
conclusionThe XELOXIRI regimen demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in the treatment of APC, providing a practical alternative to FOLFOXIRI, with similar outcomes and easier administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.