ArticleBMC public health2025
Validation and cultural adaptation of the Persian version of the suicidal ideation attributes scale (SIDAS).
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Suicidal Ideation and Its Associated Factors Among Undergraduate Medical Students and Residents in Iran: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Research.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Social support and risk perception of influenza among Chengdu residents: A cross-sectional study during post-pandemic recovery.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of Suicidal ideation is increasing in the world. A suitable tool is needed to identify suicide thoughts in the early stage. This study aimed to translation and cultural adaptation of Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) among Iranian general people.
methodsThis study was conducted on 1297 participants (EFA = 364 samples, CFA = 933 samples) in 2024. The psychometric properties of SIDAS including of face validity, content validity, construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and McDonald's omega coefficient were evaluated.
resultsThe scores of S-CVI/ Ave and CVR of SIDAS were 1 and 1, respectively. One factor with eigenvalues more than 1 was extracted in EFA section and explained 70.95% variance of SIDAS. In EFA, results showed that the rate of Kaiser Meyer Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.817. In CFA, the one factor was evaluated and confirmed based on the goodness-of-fit indices (for example: CFI = 0.995, RMSEA = 0.061, NFI = 0.994, GFI = 0.992). In reliability section, the McDonald's omega coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and ICC of SIDAS were 0.931, 0.779, and 0.880, respectively.
conclusionThe Persian version of SIDAS was confirmed with One factor and 5 items and this brief scale is appropriate for measure the presence and severity of suicidal thoughts in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.