ArticleBMC cancer2025
Comparison analysis of ICIs and chemotherapy combined with or without lenvatinib as first-line treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, lenvatinib, and reduced-dose gemcitabine/oxaliplatin as initial treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, phase II study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective first-line treatments for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remain limited. This real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy combined with or without Lenvatinib as first-line treatment in unresectable ICC patients and identify predictors of treatment response and prognosis.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 58 patients with unresectable ICC received either dual therapy (ICIs plus chemotherapy) or triple therapy (ICIs plus chemotherapy and Lenvatinib) as first-line treatment. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Survival curve was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed to investigate risk factors of PFS and OS.
resultsNo significant differences were observed between triple therapy and dual therapy as first-line treatment for unresectable ICC patients in terms of PFS (median PFS: 10.3 vs. 11.1 months, P > 0.05) and OS (median OS: 14.0 vs. 15.0 months, P > 0.05). The ORR (39.4% vs. 30.4%) and DCR (90.9% vs. 73.9%) were comparable between the triple therapy group and dual therapy group (P > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, tumor burden score (TBS, ≥ 8) and tumor number (≥ 2) were associated with prolonged PFS (P < 0.05), while TBS was an independent factor for OS (P < 0.05).
conclusionsTriple therapy did not demonstrate any benefit on both PFS and OS compared to dual therapy as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable ICC. TBS and tumor number may guide treatment stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.