Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075264›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Influence of biochar feedstock blends on soil enzyme activity, nutrient cycling, lettuce biomass accumulation and photosynthesis.

Jiri Holatko, Jiri Kucerik, Adnan Mustafa, Kamila Lonova, Manzer H Siddiqui, Muhammad Naveed, Tereza Hammerschmiedt, Antonin Kintl, Ondrej Malicek, Tomas Chorazy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jiri HolatkoDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-4673
Jiri KucerikDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-4866
Adnan MustafaDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic. adnanmustafa780@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-9672
Kamila LonovaDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 61300, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-4289
Manzer H SiddiquiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad NaveedInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Tereza HammerschmiedtDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-2019
Antonin KintlDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-083X
Ondrej MalicekDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-4344
Tomas ChorazyAdMaS Research Centre, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 651/139, Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-0708
Tivadar BaltazarDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-257X
Martin BrtnickyDepartment of Agrochemistry, SoilScience, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic. Martin.Brtnicky@mendelu.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-722X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thermal conversion of municipal sewage sludge (MSS) offers significant potential for sustainable waste management, particularly through the production of biochar. This study investigates the properties and soil application effects of three biochar types produced via pyrolysis: (i) pure sewage sludge (100%), (ii) sewage sludge blended with sawdust (50%+50%), and (iii) sewage sludge combined with sawdust and zeolite (50%+45%+5%). These biochars were applied at rates of 2.5% and 7.5% (w/w) to arable soil and assessed in an 8-week greenhouse experiment using lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant) as a model crop. The sewage sludge biochar was characterized by high nitrogen, phosphorus, and water-extractable calcium but exhibited low organic matter and organic carbon content. It enhanced soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen mineralization without affecting microbial respiration. However, at 7.5% application rate, this biochar caused the highest chlorophyll b content in lettuce, despite acidifying the soil. Adding sawdust to the pyrolysis feedstock significantly increased organic matter, organic carbon (with reduced recalcitrance), and the C: N ratio of biochar. This biochar formulation promoted microbial activity (as indicated by changes in soil respiration) and nutrient cycling, particularly through increased glucosidase activity. Conversely, addition of zeolite to the pyrolysis feedstock reduced the organic matter and organic carbon content while increasing biochar recalcitrance and nutrient immobilization, particularly of sulfur, ammonium, phosphorus, and calcium. At the 7.5% dose, the sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar improved soil pH and potentially enhanced nutrient retention. However, it did not stimulate microbial enzyme activity or respiration, leading to lower photosynthetic pigment levels and reduced biomassin lettuce, especially at higher application rate. For short-term soil applications under the conditions of this pot trial, the sewage sludge-sawdust biochar demonstrated the most beneficial effects, rapidly stimulating microbial activity and nutrient transformation. In contrast, the sewage sludge-sawdust-zeolite biochar limited nutrient availability and plant growth, suggesting it may be less suitable for immediate soil and plant nutrition. Long-term studies are needed to fully assess the implications of these biochar types for sustainable agriculture. This study highlights the importance of feedstock composition and selection in tailoring biochar properties to meet specific soil and crop requirements.

Indexed as

CharcoalLactucaPhotosynthesisSoilBiomassNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorusSewagebiocharCharcoalNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorusSewageSoilArable soilsCarbon stabilizationClimate changeMicrobial activityOrganic matterSoil amendment

Identifiers

PMID40075264
PMCPMC11905522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.