ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of preoperative drug elution balloon therapy in patients with elective tumor surgery and coronary heart disease: a retrospective clinical study : The best choice of PCI for patients with elective tumor surgery and CHD.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe selection of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) regimen for patients undergoing elective tumor surgery with coronary heart disease(CHD) remains controversial.To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using Drug Eluting Balloons (DEB) in study patients.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 127 patients undergoing elective tumor surgery with CHD who received preoperative PCI treatment at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2022 to May 2023. According to the PCI treatment plan, it is divided into Drug Eluting Balloons (DEB) group (n = 61) and Drug Eluting Stents (DES) group (n = 66). The primary endpoints of follow-up were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), while the secondary endpoints were bleeding and Venous thrombotic events. Compare the incidence of all-cause mortality events, MACE, bleeding and Venous thrombotic events between two groups of patients during the perioperative period and 1-year after the surgery.
resultsDuring perioperative period, no all-cause death occurred in both groups. MACE in DEB group was lower than that in DES group (9.8%VS.27.3%, P = 0.012). For Confirmed the overall treatment time and Interventional-surgical time, DEB group was shorter than DES group(108[60,155]VS.218[170, 320],P< 0.001),(80[45.5,120]VS.210[168,300], P< 0.001). During the follow-up period, there were all-cause mortality (3.3%VS.13.6%, P = 0.038), MACE (9.8%VS.24.2%, P = 0.032)in the DEB and DES groups.
conclusionsThe results of this retrospective study showed that the all-cause mortality and MACE in patients were significantly lower than those in the DES group. DEB can also shorten the Interventional-surgical time, thus greatly reducing the overall treatment time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.