ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Asynchronous xylogenesis among and within tree species in the central Congo Basin.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Tervuren xylarium Wood Density Database (TWDD).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Recommendations for assessing xylogenesis in angiosperm trees.Quantitative plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundXylogenesis is synchronous among trees in regions with a distinct growing season, leading to a forest-wide time lag between growth and carbon uptake. In contrast, little is known about interspecific or even intraspecific variability of xylogenesis in tropical forests. Yet an understanding of xylogenesis patterns is key to successfully combine bottom-up (e.g., from permanent forest inventory plots) and top-down (e.g., from eddy covariance flux towers) carbon flux estimates.
methodsHere, we monitor xylogenesis development of 18 trees belonging to 6 abundant species during 8 weeks at the onset of the rainy season from March to April 2022 in a semideciduous rainforest in the Yangambi reserve (central Democratic Republic of the Congo). For each tree, the weekly cambial state (dormant or active) was determined by epifluorescence microscopy.
resultsWe find interspecific variability in the cambial phenology, with two species showing predominant cambial dormancy and two species showing predominant cambial activity during the monitoring period. We also find intraspecific variability in two species where individuals either display cambial dormancy or cambial activity. All trees kept > 60% of their leaves throughout the dry season and the monitoring period, suggesting a weak relationship between the phenology of the cambial and foliar. Our results suggest that individual trees in Yangambi asynchronously activate their cambial growth throughout the year, regardless of leaf phenology or seasonal rainfall.
conclusionThese results are consistent with global analysis of gross primary productivity estimates from eddy covariance flux towers, showing that tropical biomes lack a synchronous dormant period. However, a longer-term monitoring experiment, including more species, is necessary to confirm this for the Congo Basin. As Yangambi is equipped with facilities for microscopic wood analysis, a network of inventory plots and a flux tower, further research in this site will reveal how xylogenesis patterns drive annual variability in carbon fluxes and how ground-based and top-down measurements can be combined for robust upscaling analysis of Congo basin carbon budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.