ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Short-distance seed and pollen dispersal in both hunted and intact forests in the lower canopy African rainforest tree, Coula edulis Baill. (Coulaceae).
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seed dispersal and predation of the African walnut tree, Coula edulis Baill. (Coulaceae): contrasting fates in intact and hunted rainforests.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Evidence of high genetic differentiation driven by limited gene flow in a lower canopy African tropical rainforest tree species, Coula edulis Baill. (Coulaceae).BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMammal-dispersed tropical trees can face regeneration problems due to increasing hunting pressure. We studied the case of Coula edulis Baill. (Coulaceae), an African rainforest tree that produces the 'African walnut', an essential food and income resource for rural communities. We compared gene flow and regeneration dynamics in three populations with contrasting levels of human disturbance and mammal abundance. Using 21 nuclear microsatellite markers, we estimated the outcrossing rate and contemporary seed and pollen dispersal distances, and we analyzed the fine-scale spatial genetic structure (FSGS) to infer historical gene dispersal distances.
resultsJuveniles were outcrossed while 30% of the seeds from one population were selfed, suggesting the elimination of inbred seeds. The mean dispersal distances were relatively short for seeds (105-219 m) and pollen (173-358 m), both shorter in the most intact forest. Immigration rates were three to four times higher for pollen (33-71%) than for seeds (7-28%), indicating some long-distance pollen dispersal. FSGS was strong in all populations (Sp = 0.023-0.036), suggesting short-range historical gene dispersal distances consistent with contemporary estimates. We detected assortative mating, possibly due to higher flowering synchronicity between related individuals. The most disturbed plots displayed inverted J-shaped trunk diameter structures, typical of continuous regeneration, while the intact forest had diameter structure indicating more limited regeneration.
conclusionsOur results suggest that forest disturbance and mammal hunting do not significantly affect the dispersal distances of seed and pollen for Coula edulis, contrary to other mammals-dispersed trees. We hypothesize that the main dispersers are scatter hoarding rodents that are less impacted, or even facilitated, by hunting pressure. The species appears to regenerate better in disturbed forests, possibly due to a reduction in seed and seedling predators. However, natural populations are threatened by ongoing forest conversion into agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.