ArticleHeredity2025
Detection of positive selection on depression-associated genes.
Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression patterns of risk genes associated with three evolutionarily relevant syndromes in rhesus macaque and human brains.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- A global map for introgressed structural variation and selection in humans.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although depression significantly impacts fitness, some hypotheses suggest that it may offer a survival benefit. However, there has been limited systematic investigation into the selection pressures acting on genes associated with depression at the genomic level. Here, we conducted comparative genomic analyses and computational molecular evolutionary analyses on 320 depression-associated genes at two levels, i.e., across the primate phylogeny (long timescale selection) and in modern human populations (recent selection). We identified seven genes under positive selection in the human lineage, and 46 genes under positive selection in modern human populations. Most positively selected variants in modern human populations were at UTR regions and non-coding exons, indicating the importance of gene expression regulation in the evolution of depression-associated genes. Positively selected genes are not only related to immune responses, but also function in reproduction and dietary adaptation. Notably, the proportion of depression-associated genes under positive selection was significantly higher than the positively selected genes at the genome-wide average level in African, East Asian, and South Asian populations. We also identified two positively selected loci that happened to be associated with depression in the South Asian population. Our study revealed that depression-associated genes are subject to varying selection pressures across different populations. We suggest that, in precision medicine-particularly in gene therapy-it is crucial to consider the specific functions of genes within distinct populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.