ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-feature fusion RFE random forest for schizophrenia classification and treatment response prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting postpartum convulsions using clinical indicators from PMA Ethiopia data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schizophrenia(SZ) classification and treatment response prediction hold substantial clinical application value. However, only a limited number of researchers have exploited the multi-feature information derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to achieve short-term drug-treatment SZ classification and treatment response prediction. We developed a multi-feature fusion recursive feature elimination random forest (RFE-RF) approach for SZ classification and treatment response prediction. Initially, we computed multiple features, such as regional homogeneity, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations, and functional connectivity. Subsequently, the RFE-RF method was employed to conduct SZ classification. Moreover, we utilized the rate of score reduction (RR) of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) to forecast the treatment response of individual patients. Finally, we identified the neuroimaging biomarkers for SZ classification and drug-treatment response prediction. This method achieved the classification results (accuracy = 91.7%, sensitivity = 90.9%, and specificity = 92.6%), and the abnormalities in the visual and default mode networks emerged as potential neuroimaging biomarkers for differentiating SZ from healthy controls (HC). Additionally, we predicted the drug-treatment response of SZ patients in terms of their total PANSS scores, as well as negative and positive symptom scores after eight weeks of treatment. Specifically, the abnormalities in the visual network, sensorimotor network, and right superior frontal gyrus are crucial biomarkers for the short-term drug-treatment response of negative symptoms in SZ patients. Meanwhile, the abnormalities in the visual and default mode networks serve as important biomarkers of the short-term drug-treatment response of positive symptoms. There findings offer novel insights into the neural mechanisms underlying SZ following eight weeks of short-term drug treatment. With further clinical validation in the future, this research may provide potential biomarkers and intervention targets for personalized treatment of SZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.