Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075165›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2026

The efficacy of penoscrotal decompression for refractory ischaemic priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohamed Mubarak, Qasim Isa, John Hayes, Ian Pearce, Vaibhav Modgil

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed MubarakHealth Education England North East Deanery, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Mohamed.mubarak1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-999X
Qasim IsaGovernment Hospital, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
John HayesHealth Education England North East Deanery, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ian PearceManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Vaibhav ModgilManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penoscrotal decompression (PSD) has emerged as a promising surgical intervention for refractory ischaemic priapism, involving proximal corporotomies and the drainage of ischaemic blood. Initial outcomes have shown high success rates in achieving detumescence, low recurrence rates, and relatively good preservation of erectile function. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate PSD's effectiveness across three key metrics: detumescence, prevention of recurrence, and erectile function preservation. A systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, identified 9 publications that met the inclusion criteria. They encompassed five case reports, two abstracts, and two observational cohort studies, with data on 62 patients who presented with refractory ischaemic priapism. Notably, around half (46.7%) of the patients had conventional distal shunts prior to PSD. Overall following PSD, detumescence was achieved in 89.3% (CI 95%, 0.78-0.95). Post-PSD recurrence of ischaemic priapism occurred in 12.7% (95% CI, 0.06-0.24). Erectile function was preserved in 54.8% of the patients who had follow-up (95% CI, 0.40-0.68). These findings inform us that PSD proves to be a viable and effective surgical option for refractory ischaemic priapism with a key feature being better sexual function preservation outcomes compared to shunting procedures. Given the paucity of data, further larger scale prospective studies of robust designs are still necessary to better establish PSD's role within the treatment algorithm for refractory ischaemic priapism.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalIschemiaPenisPriapismScrotumHumansMalePenile ErectionRecurrenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.