ArticleCommunications biology2025
A structure-based framework for selective inhibitor design and optimization.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Design with Artificial Intelligence: Progress and Perspectives for Small Molecules.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Enabling multi-target drug discovery through latent evolutionary optimization and synthesis-aware prioritization (EVOSYNTH).Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- From dual inhibition to precision selectivity: the molecular rationale and clinical evolution of next-generation PARP1-selective inhibitors in solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Multifaceted Small Molecules as Enzyme Modulators: Cases of Drug Discovery/Repurposing Illustrating Nature's Pragmatism.BioMed research international · 2026Review
- O-GlcNAcylation in novel regulated cell death: ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structure-based drug design aims to create active compounds with favorable properties by analyzing target structures. Recently, deep generative models have facilitated structure-specific molecular generation. However, many methods are limited by inadequate pharmaceutical data, resulting in suboptimal molecular properties and unstable conformations. Additionally, these approaches often overlook binding pocket interactions and struggle with selective inhibitor design. To address these challenges, we developed a framework called Coarse-grained and Multi-dimensional Data-driven molecular generation (CMD-GEN). CMD-GEN bridges ligand-protein complexes with drug-like molecules by utilizing coarse-grained pharmacophore points sampled from diffusion model, enriching training data. Through a hierarchical architecture, it decomposes three-dimensional molecule generation within the pocket into pharmacophore point sampling, chemical structure generation, and conformation alignment, mitigating instability issues. CMD-GEN outperforms other methods in benchmark tests and controls drug-likeness effectively. Furthermore, CMD-GEN excels in cases across three synthetic lethal targets, and wet-lab validation with PARP1/2 inhibitors confirms its potential in selective inhibitor design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.