Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075151›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cross-limb transfer during isometric plantar flexion familiarization.

Logeswary Krisnan, Ashril Yusof, Suresh Marathamuthu, Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Logeswary KrisnanFaculty of Sports and Exercise Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ashril YusofFaculty of Sports and Exercise Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Suresh MarathamuthuNational Sports Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Victor Selvarajah SelvanayagamFaculty of Sports and Exercise Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. victors@um.edu.my.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) FP014-2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the number of contractions required for an isometric plantar flexion familiarization. Twenty-six males were separated into two independent Groups: Group A: where five contractions were initiated on the dominant limb (right) followed by the contralateral limb; and Group B, initiated by the non-dominant limb (left) followed by the dominant limb. Participants carried out a 5-s maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), with an interpolated twitch administered to the tibial nerve. In Group A, both the dominant and non-dominant limbs required two contractions for familiarization, whereas in Group B, the dominant limb required two contractions, and the non-dominant limb required three (p < 0.05). A strong relationship between MVC and voluntary activation (VA) was observed in Group A for the D (r = 0.91, p < 0.05) and in Group B for the ND limb (r = 0.99, p < 0.05). The results demonstrated evidence of cross-limb transfer from the dominant to the non-dominant limb (p < 0.05). This phenomenon implicates central involvement, substantiated by VA responses that mirror the changes in MVC. Practitioners and researchers should consider the impact of cross-limb transfer during a single familiarization session when assessing strength to avoid overestimation of the gains. Future cross-education/cross-limb transfer studies could investigate the central mechanisms involved during familiarization.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionMuscle, SkeletalAdultElectromyographyFunctional LateralityHumansMaleYoung AdultCross-limb transferFamiliarizationMaximal voluntary contractionSingle sessionVoluntary activation

Identifiers

PMID40075151
PMCPMC11903993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.