ArticleScientific reports2025
Counterfactual explanations of tree based ensemble models for brain disease analysis with structure function coupling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing healthcare explainability through multiobjective counterfactual explanations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Structural Connectivity Disruption and Structural-Functional Decoupling in Working Memory Networks Across Pre-Dialysis and Maintenance Hemodialysis End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Observational
- Early classification of functional connectomes in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of machine learning classifiers using multi-scale topological features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Convergent evidence has suggested that the disruption of either structural connectivity (SC) or functional connectivity (FC) in the brain can lead to various neuropsychiatric disorders. Since changes in SC-FC coupling may be more sensitive than a single modality to detect subtle brain connectivity abnormalities, a few learning-based methods have been proposed to explore the relationship between SC and FC. However, these existing methods still fail to explain the relationship between altered SC-FC coupling and brain disorders. Therefore, in this paper, we explore three types of tree-based ensemble models (i.e., Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Adaptive Boosting) toward counterfactual explanations for SC-FC coupling. Specifically, we first construct SC and FC matrices from preprocessed diffusion-weighted DTI and resting-state functional fMRI data. Then, we quantify the SC-FC coupling strength of each region and convert it into feature vectors. Subsequently, we select SC-FC coupling features that can reflect disease-related information and trained three tree-based models to analyze the predictive role of these coupling features for diseases. Finally, we design a tree ensemble counterfactual explanation model to generate a set of counterfactual examples for patients, thereby assisting the diagnosis of brain diseases by fine-tuning the patient's abnormal SC-FC coupling feature vector. Experimental results on two independent datasets (i.e., epilepsy and schizophrenia) validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The identified discriminative brain regions and generated counterfactual examples provide new insights for brain disease analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.