ArticleScientific reports2025
Receptor mechanism producing a sweet taste from plant aroma compounds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Drivers of Sweetness, Sourness, and Astringency in Apple Juice Identified Using Support Vector Machine Regression.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Identification of key aromatic compounds responsible for sweetening sensory effect in Jinmudan black tea though flavoromics and molecular modeling.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Meaty Aroma Compounds Enhance MSG Umami Perception Through Allosteric Modulation of T1R1/T1R3 Receptor: Evidence from Nasal Clip Sensory Evaluation and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fruits and vegetables contain highly volatile hydrophobic small molecules responsible for their aroma, taste, and pungency. Empirically, we understand that these compounds can evoke a sweet taste; however, their specific interactions with sweet taste receptors are unclear. To address this issue, HEK293 cells expressing human and mouse sweet taste receptors TAS1R2/TAS1R3 were used to identify trans-2-hexenal (a novel sweetener) in human and cinnamyl alcohol (a sweetness inhibitor) in mice. The effects of these compounds on TAS1R2/TAS1R3 in humans and mice were evaluated alongside known hydrophobic sweet compounds, and the results showed that they elicited responses in human TAS1R2/TAS1R3 but not in mice. Conversely, some compounds inhibited the sweetness of sucralose both in vitro and in vivo. Response analysis using human and mouse chimeric TAS1R2 and point mutants of TAS1R2 using docking simulations indicated that these compounds bind to the transmembrane domain of TAS1R2 and that multiple amino acid residues are essential to generate a sweet taste. These results indicate that highly volatile hydrophobic compounds generate aroma and sweetness through a different mechanism than hydrophilic sweeteners, such as sucrose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.