Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075090›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

CMAB: A Multi-Attribute Building Dataset of China.

Yecheng Zhang, Huimin Zhao, Ying Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yecheng Zhang *School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-2737
Huimin Zhao *School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Ying LongSchool of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. ylong@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8657-6988

Funding

Energy Foundation (EF) G-2306-34815National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52178044National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62394331National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62394335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly acquiring three-dimensional (3D) building data, including geometric attributes like rooftop, height and orientations, as well as indicative attributes like function, quality, and age, is essential for accurate urban analysis, simulations, and policy updates. Current building datasets suffer from incomplete coverage of building multi-attributes. This paper presents the first national-scale Multi-Attribute Building dataset (CMAB) with artificial intelligence, covering 3,667 spatial cities, 31 million buildings, and 23.6 billion m² of rooftops with an F1-Score of 89.93% in OCRNet-based extraction, totaling 363 billion m³ of building stock. We trained bootstrap aggregated XGBoost models with city administrative classifications, incorporating morphology, location, and function features. Using multi-source data, including billions of remote sensing images and 60 million street view images (SVIs), we generated rooftop, height, structure, function, style, age, and quality attributes for each building with machine learning and large multimodal models. Accuracy was validated through model benchmarks, existing similar products, and manual SVI validation, mostly above 80%. Our dataset and results are crucial for global SDGs and urban planning.

Identifiers

PMID40075090
PMCPMC11903664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.