ArticleScientific reports2025
FPGA implementation of a complete digital spiking silicon neuron for circuit design and network approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When attempting to replicate the same biological spiking neuron model actions of the human brain, the spiking neuron model methodology and hardware realization design for the nervous system of the brain are crucial considerations. This work provides a modified neural modeling of complete Digital Spiking Silicon neuron model (DSSN4D). This model is capable for regenerating the basic attributes of the original model using a simplified power-2 based modeling technique. The suggested spiking neuron model is based on the fundamental power-2 based operations that can be implemented similar to the basic attributes of the main model. Removing the nonlinear parts of the main model (original one) and replacing them with modified ones leads to achieving a low-cost, low-error, and high-frequency digital system rather than the original modeling. A Xilinx Virtex-7 XC7VX690T FPGA board has been thought of and utilized for hardware realization and of the proposed model (this can validate the proposed system). The original and proposed models (in terms of neural activities) exhibit a significant degree of resemblance, according to hardware results. Additionally, greater frequency and low-cost conditions have been attained. Results of implementation indicate that overall savings are higher than for other papers and the original approach. Additionally, the new neural model's frequency, which is roughly 502.184 MHz, is much greater than the original model's frequency, which was 224 MHz. Also, results in hardware level shows that the proposed model takes a maximum 0.01% of the available resources of a Virtex-7 FPGA board.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.