Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075024›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2025

First-Line Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥ 1%: A Retrospective Analysis of RATIONALE-306.

Jianming Xu, Ken Kato, Richard Hubner, Sook Ryun Park, Takashi Kojima, Ryu Ishihara, Lucjan Wyrwicz, Eric Van Cutsem, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca, Hongqian Wu and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03783442 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03783442 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Unresectable, Locally Advanced Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeiGeneRan2018 to 2024Enrolled649ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)ArmsCisplatin, Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil (5-FU), Capecitabine, Paclitaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jianming XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4467-6021
Ken KatoDepartment of Head and Neck, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-5072
Richard HubnerDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7081-8823
Sook Ryun ParkDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-5016
Takashi KojimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Ryu IshiharaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-718X
Lucjan WyrwiczDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Cancer Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-6892
Eric Van CutsemDepartment of Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-1230
Paula Jimenez-FonsecaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Central University Hospital of Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-3813
Hongqian WuBiostatistics, BeiGene USA, Inc., Ridgefield Park, NJ, USA.
Lei WangClinical Development, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Sebastian YanClinical Development, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Jingwen ShiClinical Biomarker, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-0727
Alysha KadvaClinical Development, BeiGene USA, Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-8373
Harry H YoonDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. yoon.harry@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6208-3487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe United States Food and Drug Administration Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted (September 2024) against the use of programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score < 1% or combined positive score < 1 due to an unfavorable benefit-risk profile observed across the phase 3 CheckMate 648, KEYNOTE-590, and RATIONALE-306 trials. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of RATIONALE-306 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus investigator-chosen chemotherapy (ICC) versus placebo plus ICC in patients with advanced or metastatic unresectable ESCC and a PD-L1 TAP score ≥ 1%.

methodsAdult patients with advanced or metastatic unresectable ESCC enrolled in the global, randomized, phase 3 RATIONALE-306 trial randomly received tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus ICC or matched placebo plus ICC. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated among patients who were retrospectively assessed for PD-L1 expression defined by a TAP score ≥ 1%.

resultsAt primary analysis data cutoff (February 28, 2022), a clinically meaningful improvement in median overall survival was observed among 230 patients in the tislelizumab plus ICC arm {16.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.3-20.8] months} versus 248 patients in the placebo plus ICC arm [9.6 (95% CI 8.9-11.8) months] [stratified hazard ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.51-0.80)]; this was maintained at a 3-year follow-up data cutoff (November 24, 2023). Similar findings at primary analysis were observed for progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and duration of response. Tislelizumab plus ICC was tolerable and no new safety signals were observed.

conclusionsTislelizumab plus ICC is an effective and well tolerated first-line treatment option for patients with advanced or metastatic unresectable ESCC and a tumor PD-L1 TAP score ≥ 1%. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03783442.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAdultAgedClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSecondary Data AnalysisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humantislelizumabClinical trialEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaImmunotherapyPD-1 inhibitorTislelizumab

Identifiers

PMID40075024
PMCPMC12006250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.