ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2025
[Visual estimation of blood losses : Known high error rate-How can it be improved?]
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every day blood losses are visually estimated by medical personnel (physicians, midwives, paramedics) because an exact quantitative measurement is impossible or impractical. Anesthesiologists are confronted with blood loss in the operating room, in the delivery room, in the emergency room and at the scene of an emergency; however, the literature shows that in all the named areas enormous errors occur in the visual estimation. Errors of 50% and more are not uncommon, which means that, e.g., an estimated blood loss of 2000ml could actually be 3000ml or only 1000ml. General, in all the abovenamed areas blood losses are more likely to be underestimated than overestimated. The ability to make an estimation is not improved by professional experience. The amount of blood loss indicates and "justifies" invasive measures and the administration of blood and cost-intensive blood products. This overview is dedicated to the problems in the estimation of blood loss, demonstrates the sequelae of an incorrectly estimated blood loss, provides tips on how the ability to make an estimation can be improved and describes the considerable potential of further education as well as which digital support options are now available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40074975What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.