Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074928›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Guidelines and recommendations for radiologist staffing, education and training.

Adrian P Brady, Christian Loewe, Boris Brkljacic, Graciano Paulo, Martina Szucsich, Monika Hierath, European Society of Radiology

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrian P BradyDepartment of Radiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. adrianbrady@me.com.
Christian LoeweDivision of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Boris BrkljacicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Graciano PauloPolytechnic University of Coimbra, IPC-ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Coimbra, Portugal.
Martina SzucsichEuropean Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria.
Monika HierathEuropean Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria.
European Society of Radiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article outlines the radiology-related staffing and education/training guidelines and recommendations developed by the European Commission-funded EU-REST (European Union Radiation, Education, Staffing & Training) project. The radiologist consortium partners propose the use of hour of machine/system/activity as the basic unit to calculate radiologist staffing needs. Education and training recommendations for radiologists include establishing 5 years as the standard duration of specialty training in radiology and establishing the ESR European Training Curriculum for Radiology as the European-wide standard. General recommendations for all professional groups include the maintenance of a central registry for each professional group and for relevant equipment, by each EU Member State, mandated CPD including techniques and knowledge relevant to each professional group, adoption vs adaptation of the project's recommendations. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiology-related staffing and education/training guidelines and recommendations developed by the EU-REST project propose a novel approach to calculate radiologist staffing numbers and provide recommendations regarding radiology education and training as well as general recommendations for all professional groups covered by the project. KEY POINTS: The pros and cons of taking population, workload, equipment or bed availability numbers as parameters to calculate radiology workforce are described. The reasons why these parameters are not suitable to calculate radiologist staffing needs are explained. The proposed use of hour of machine/system/activity as the basic unit to calculate radiologist staffing needs allows for establishing an adaptable and scalable guideline. Education and training recommendations for radiologists and non-profession-specific recommendations are summarised.

Indexed as

Basic Safety Standards DirectiveEducation and trainingRadiation protectionRadiologyWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID40074928
PMCPMC11904080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.